Although WebP has long been a well-liked picture format on the web, Google has now unveiled Jpegli, a competitor for JPEG compression. Both seek to minimize the size of picture files without sacrificing quality, although they vary significantly. In this post, we'll examine every distinction between Jpegli and WebP.
Jpegli vs WebP: Distinctions
WebP is an image format, whereas Jpegli is a JPEG encoder library. This is the primary distinction between the two. Jpegli is used to compress JPEGs without significantly sacrificing picture quality, keeping the JPEG format intact.
Conversely, WebP is an image format that employs both lossy and lossless compression, much like JPEG. But since it can handle moving pictures, translucent backgrounds, and PNGs, it's superior and more flexible than JPEGs. In conclusion, WebP is an image format (). Jpegli, on the other hand, is a JPEG image format compression tool.Feature Jpegli WebP Type JPEG encoder Image format Purpose Improved JPEG compression Smaller file size for web use Compression Lossy only Lossy and Lossless Use cases To optimize existing JPEGs New image format for web use Compatibility Works with the existing JPEGs and is backward compatible Compatible across all web browsers, supports transparent backgrounds
Which Is Better, Jpegli or WebP?
Once again, because WebP and Jpegli have distinct conceptual foundations, they cannot be compared. However, WebP image format may be compared to JPEG, which supports Jpegli encoding.Compared to JPEGs and PNGs, WebP pictures are around 34% and 26% smaller, respectively. WebP also includes lossy and lossless compressions. Jpegli encoding, on the other hand, allowed JPEGs to compress by up to 35% without significantly sacrificing quality or artifacting.But Jpegli's restriction to JPEGs is one of the main causes. On the other hand, WebP supports animated pictures (GIFs) and images with transparent backgrounds, such as PNGs and JPEGs.