The Intel 4 manufacturing process serves as the foundation for the brand-new Meteor Lake architecture from Intel. This architecture is used in the latest Core Ultra CPUs; most recently, the Core Ultra 7 155H has been tested using Linux-based benchmarks. After doing the tests, Phoronix.com has concluded that AMD's Ryzen 7 7840U wins against the Core Ultra 7 155H.
Two AMD and Intel CPUs were used for a total of 370 tests . These Linux OS benchmarks and tests were CPU-focused. Only 75 tests showed the advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H, while Ryzen 7 7840U prevailed in 295 tests. The final "geometric mean" of all findings showed that the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U outperformed the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H by 28%.
What precisely is happening, then? Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U better than the Intel Core Ultra? It's not a simple question to answer. First of all, each CPU may have unique advantages. High-performance CPUs, like Intel's H-Series chips, put performance over efficiency. Other chips, like those in the P/U series, prioritise efficiency above performance.
These tests could accurately represent the performance of AMD Ryzen and Core Ultra (in Linux-specific CPU benchmarks). Nevertheless, this testing doesn't tell the whole tale.
Including the Meteor Lake integrated Arc GPU, compute tile P-cores & E-cores, a new form of Low Power (LP) E-Core, and the brand-new neural processing unit (NPU) component that accelerates AI, the most recent Intel Core Ultra processor is comprised of these components. Intel is promoting this next generation as having "three AI engines" together. Core Ultra processors perform better in programs that may benefit from this hybrid design.